WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "9a640054-0107-400a-8cfb-6cc254554e59"}, "_deposit": {"id": "37836", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "37836"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp:00037836", "sets": ["712"]}, "author_link": ["71361", "71362"], "control_number": "37836", "item_11_biblio_info_8": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2007-03-29", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "60", "bibliographicPageStart": "47", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "10", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "ジェンダー研究 : お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究センター年報"}]}]}, "item_11_description_17": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_11_description_46": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "紀要論文", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_11_description_6": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper critically evaluates the US Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)by focusing on the discussion concerning the notion of “responsibility.” The Court’s decision upheld most of the provisions of the Pennsylvania legislature, imposing a new standard to determine the validity of laws restricting abortions in order to acknowledge the significance of a community’s value respecting a life of the unborn child. This decision is seen as emphasizing a state abortion regulation imposing a “responsibility,” rather than women’s right to abortions. Therefore, women seeking an abortion could be isolated from the community which imposes a responsibility for a life of the unborn child because of the provisions of the legislature restricting abortions.\nI argue that the Court’s decision can be seen as a failure to take into account the real experiences of individual pregnant women. Carol Gilligan’s study has previously showed how women seeking an abortion recognize the notion of “responsibility.” Building on Gilligan’s argument and findings, I reexamine the discussion regarding the notion of “responsibility” in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_11_full_name_2": {"attribute_name": "著者(ヨミ)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "71362", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "やまもと, ちあき"}]}]}, "item_11_publisher_36": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究センター"}]}, "item_11_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11391754", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_11_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13450638", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_11_subject_20": {"attribute_name": "日本十進分類法", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "367", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDC"}]}, "item_11_text_18": {"attribute_name": "形態", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "531602 bytes"}]}, "item_11_text_47": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ・ローカル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "紀要論文"}]}, "item_11_text_48": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ・NII", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]}, "item_11_text_49": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ・DCMI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "text"}]}, "item_11_text_50": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ・ローカル表示コード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "03"}]}, "item_11_text_79": {"attribute_name": "所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "お茶の水女子大学大学院人間文化研究科博士後期過程1年"}]}, "item_1623395637221": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "山本, 千晶", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "YAMAMOTO, Chiaki", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "71361", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-04-19"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "03_47-60.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "531.6 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 531600.0, "url": {"label": "03_47-60.pdf", "url": "https://teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp/record/37836/files/03_47-60.pdf"}, "version_id": "062b2178-1b0b-4ca0-bbdb-f666fac65515"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "中絶", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "フェミニズム", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Casey判決", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "身体", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "責任", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "「責任」をめぐるCasey判決とフェミニズム理論", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "「責任」をめぐるCasey判決とフェミニズム理論", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "A Feminist Discourse and the Discussion of ‘Responsibility’in the Decision of Planned Parenthood v. Casey", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "11", "owner": "1", "path": ["712"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10083/35629", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2010-02-01"}, "publish_date": "2010-02-01", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "37836", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["「責任」をめぐるCasey判決とフェミニズム理論"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
「責任」をめぐるCasey判決とフェミニズム理論
http://hdl.handle.net/10083/35629
http://hdl.handle.net/10083/35629533ca11c-0e0c-4124-92f2-1f5997381548
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
03_47-60.pdf (531.6 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2010-02-01 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | 「責任」をめぐるCasey判決とフェミニズム理論 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | A Feminist Discourse and the Discussion of ‘Responsibility’in the Decision of Planned Parenthood v. Casey | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 中絶 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | フェミニズム | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Casey判決 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 身体 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 責任 | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
著者 |
山本, 千晶
× 山本, 千晶 |
|||||
著者(ヨミ) | ||||||
識別子 | 71362 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | やまもと, ちあき | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This paper critically evaluates the US Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)by focusing on the discussion concerning the notion of “responsibility.” The Court’s decision upheld most of the provisions of the Pennsylvania legislature, imposing a new standard to determine the validity of laws restricting abortions in order to acknowledge the significance of a community’s value respecting a life of the unborn child. This decision is seen as emphasizing a state abortion regulation imposing a “responsibility,” rather than women’s right to abortions. Therefore, women seeking an abortion could be isolated from the community which imposes a responsibility for a life of the unborn child because of the provisions of the legislature restricting abortions. I argue that the Court’s decision can be seen as a failure to take into account the real experiences of individual pregnant women. Carol Gilligan’s study has previously showed how women seeking an abortion recognize the notion of “responsibility.” Building on Gilligan’s argument and findings, I reexamine the discussion regarding the notion of “responsibility” in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision. |
|||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
ジェンダー研究 : お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究センター年報 巻 10, p. 47-60, 発行日 2007-03-29 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 13450638 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11391754 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
形態 | ||||||
531602 bytes | ||||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
主題 | 367 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究センター | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 紀要論文 | |||||
資源タイプ・ローカル | ||||||
紀要論文 | ||||||
資源タイプ・NII | ||||||
Departmental Bulletin Paper | ||||||
資源タイプ・DCMI | ||||||
text | ||||||
資源タイプ・ローカル表示コード | ||||||
03 | ||||||
所属 | ||||||
お茶の水女子大学大学院人間文化研究科博士後期過程1年 |