{"created":"2021-07-22T02:24:41.794649+00:00","id":2000177,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"9ced54c7-7b1e-4811-abd9-1f489c3fa000"},"_deposit":{"created_by":23,"id":"2000177","owner":"23","owners":[23],"owners_ext":{"displayname":"ocha","username":"40927014"},"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000177"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp:02000177","sets":["347:349:1619413006946"]},"author_link":[],"control_number":"2000177","item_11_biblio_info_8":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-03","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"22","bibliographicPageStart":"5","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"10","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"お茶の水女子大学英文学会 研究報告","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"Journal of the Ochanomizu University English Society","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_11_description_6":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"This paper aims to investigate what types of feedback comments pre-intermediate to intermediate learners of English in a women’s university in Japan generate in peer review. It also intends to clarify how the learners revise their essays. The participants consisted of two groups: One did peer review five times, and the other received automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback four times before one peer-review occasion. The participants’ reflection texts were used as data for analyses. The findings suggest that second language (L2) learners provide more critical feedback than compliments and more comments on global aspects of essays than local points in both groups. Time-series analyses and comparison with a control group that received AWE feedback showed that the number of peer-review opportunities contributed to increased critical comments and the comments on global points. It was also found that more specific and writer-friendly feedback comments consisting of two or three steps increased as the participants became more experienced in peer review. In both groups, the rate of the writers’ incorporation of critical comments into their revisions was found to be high, and they also used their own ideas and judgments to revise their drafts. Implications of the findings and limitations of this research are discussed.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_11_publisher_36":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"お茶の水女子大学英文学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_1623395637221":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"畠山, 由香子","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"HATAKEYAMA, Yukako","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2021-07-22"}],"filename":"No10_p5-22.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"502 KB"}],"format":"application/pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp/record/2000177/files/No10_p5-22.pdf"},"version_id":"fb482b11-7ef1-4669-9dd7-188a7acf4fc5"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"peer review","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"L2 writing","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"feedback comments","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"AWE","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"revision strategies","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"Peer Feedback Comments and Revision Strategies of L2 Writers: Insights from the Analyses of Their Reflection Texts","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"Peer Feedback Comments and Revision Strategies of L2 Writers: Insights from the Analyses of Their Reflection Texts","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"11","owner":"23","path":["1619413006946"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2021-07-22"},"publish_date":"2021-07-22","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000177","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["Peer Feedback Comments and Revision Strategies of L2 Writers: Insights from the Analyses of Their Reflection Texts"],"weko_creator_id":"23","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2022-12-12T06:13:29.073323+00:00"}