@article{oai:teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp:02000540,
 author = {畠山, 由香子 and HATAKEYAMA, Yukako},
 journal = {お茶の水女子大学英文学会 研究報告, Journal of the Ochanomizu University English Society},
 month = {},
 note = {This paper aims to elucidate the students’ perspectives on peer review and their strategies in giving critical
feedback by reporting the findings from the semi-structured interview of four students who took one of the
author’s three writing classes in the second half of the academic year 2020. Additionally, it reveals the participants’
perceptions of the effectiveness of Grammarly and Criterion®, software for assisting and evaluating
writing, as they were used concurrently with peer review. It was found that the participants’ perspectives of
the benefits and drawbacks of peer review supported the findings in the previous studies. The feelings about
giving critical feedback varied among the participants, yet they consciously used various strategies for providing
critical feedback in their own ways. Through the interview, the need for and difficulty in communication
in online classes is confirmed. The participants’ experience with and perception of Grammarly and Criterion®
unveiled the software’s potential and the need for appropriate training to maximize its effectiveness. These
findings provide insights for preparatory training as well as for optimal use of various feedback types. Limitations
of this research are discussed as well.},
 pages = {19--35},
 title = {Peer Review: Student Perspectives and Strategies Found from a Semi-Structured Interview},
 volume = {11},
 year = {2022}
}