{"created":"2023-12-01T06:11:51.120716+00:00","id":2003987,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"8ded8754-b9b9-4f3b-ad3d-5a412f25338c"},"_deposit":{"created_by":133,"id":"2003987","owner":"133","owners":[133],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2003987"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp:02003987","sets":["347:381:1701311340812"]},"author_link":[],"item_11_biblio_info_8":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2023-11-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"39","bibliographicPageStart":"31","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"30","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"生活社会科学研究","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_11_description_6":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"母体保護法14 条では，人工妊娠中絶にあたって，本人のほかに配偶者の同意を求めている（以下，配偶者同意要件という．）．本稿では，母体保護法とその前身である国民優生法・優生保護法における配偶者同意要件の歴史的な位置づけや，現在の運用を踏まえ，配偶者同意要件の趣旨についての見解を整理し，その妥当性を検討した．\nまず国民優生法には人工妊娠中絶に関して配偶者同意要件にあたる規定がなく，人工妊娠中絶の配偶者同意要件は，優生保護法においてはじめて設けられた．優生保護法成立時の本要件の立法趣旨は明確でないが，その趣旨を〔1〕婚姻関係の保護とした通知がある．また母体保護法成立以降，行政によって明らかとされた趣旨には，〔2〕胎児の生命尊重と〔3〕胎児の親として配偶者の有する権利の保護がある．司法では，岡山地裁判決において〔4〕配偶者の意思表明の機会を得る利益の保護という解釈が見られる．\nこれらの見解について，まず〔1〕と〔2〕によっては本要件を十分に説明できない．〔3〕は「胎児の親」を血縁上の親と解釈した場合には14 条の文言や運用の現状と，〔4〕は文言と，合致しない．また〔3〕の「胎児の親」を法律上の親として解釈した場合には文言と運用に齟齬しないが，仮にそうであるとしても，その権利が，どうして胎児の血縁上の親であるが配偶者でない男性や女性本人に対して優越するとみなされるのかについては，疑問が残る．よって，現在見られる配偶者同意要件の趣旨に関する見解は，いずれも妥当でないように思われる．","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"Article 14 of the Maternal Health Act requires the consent of the spouse for an abortion in addition to that of the female herself（ Hereinafter the requirement is referred to as the spousal consent requirement.）. In light of the historical position of the spousal consent requirement in the Maternal Health Act and its predecessors, the National Eugenic Act and the Eugenic Protection Act, and its operation, this paper summarizes and examines views on the purpose of the requirement.\nFirstly, the National Eugenic Act had no provision concerning the spousal consent for an abortion, and the spousal consent requirement for an abortion was established in the Eugenic Protection Act. Although the legislative intent of this requirement at that time is not clear, there is a notice stating that the purpose is〔1〕to protect the marital relation. Secondly, after the Maternal Health Act was enacted, the administrative authorities clarified the purpose of this requirement as〔2〕to respect the life of the fetus and〔3〕to protect the right of the spouse as the parent of the fetus. Finally, the Okayama District Court decision interpreted the purpose as 〔4〕to protect the interest of the spouse in having the opportunity to express their opinion.\nRegarding these views,〔1〕and〔2〕do not fully explain the requirement.〔3〕does not match Article 14 or the current operation of the requirement if \"the parent of the fetus\" is interpreted as the biological parent, and〔4〕does not match the article. Concerning〔3〕, if \"the parent of the fetus\" is interpreted as the legal parent, there is no conflict between the view and the article and the operation. However, in this case, the question remains as to why the right of the legal father should be considered superior to that of the male who is not the legal but the biological father, or that of the female. Thus, none of the current views on the purpose of the spousal consent requirement seems reasonable.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_11_publisher_36":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"お茶の水女子大学生活社会科学研究会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_11_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10459016","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1623395637221":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"作成者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"新山, 惟乃","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"NIIYAMA, Yuino","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2023-12-01"}],"filename":"03_p31-39.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"301 KB"}],"format":"application/pdf","license_note":"※本文は閲覧のみ可能です。印刷はできません。","licensetype":"license_note","url":{"url":"https://teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp/record/2003987/files/03_p31-39.pdf"},"version_id":"293b5440-17c8-41e5-9dd2-06ef6e8b16a3"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"[研究ノート]なぜ人工妊娠中絶に配偶者の同意が求められるのか ―配偶者同意要件の歴史的位置づけと運用を踏まえて","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"[研究ノート]なぜ人工妊娠中絶に配偶者の同意が求められるのか ―配偶者同意要件の歴史的位置づけと運用を踏まえて","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Why Is the Consent of the Spouse Required for an Abortion? In Light of the Historical Position and the Operation of the Spousal Consent Requirement","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"11","owner":"133","path":["1701311340812"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-12-01"},"publish_date":"2023-12-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"2003987","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["[研究ノート]なぜ人工妊娠中絶に配偶者の同意が求められるのか ―配偶者同意要件の歴史的位置づけと運用を踏まえて"],"weko_creator_id":"133","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-12-01T06:18:46.220361+00:00"}