{"created":"2021-03-01T06:43:39.684939+00:00","id":37836,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"9a640054-0107-400a-8cfb-6cc254554e59"},"_deposit":{"id":"37836","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"37836"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp:00037836","sets":["347:362:712"]},"author_link":["71361","71362"],"control_number":"37836","item_11_biblio_info_8":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2007-03-29","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"60","bibliographicPageStart":"47","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"10","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"ジェンダー研究 : お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究センター年報"}]}]},"item_11_description_17":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_11_description_46":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"紀要論文","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_11_description_6":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"This paper critically evaluates the US Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)by focusing on the discussion concerning the notion of “responsibility.” The Court’s decision upheld most of the provisions of the Pennsylvania legislature, imposing a new standard to determine the validity of laws restricting abortions in order to acknowledge the significance of a community’s value respecting a life of the unborn child. This decision is seen as emphasizing a state abortion regulation imposing a “responsibility,” rather than women’s right to abortions. Therefore, women seeking an abortion could be isolated from the community which imposes a responsibility for a life of the unborn child because of the provisions of the legislature restricting abortions.\nI argue that the Court’s decision can be seen as a failure to take into account the real experiences of individual pregnant women. Carol Gilligan’s study has previously showed how women seeking an abortion recognize the notion of “responsibility.” Building on Gilligan’s argument and findings, I reexamine the discussion regarding the notion of “responsibility” in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_11_full_name_2":{"attribute_name":"著者(ヨミ)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"71362","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"やまもと, ちあき"}]}]},"item_11_publisher_36":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究センター"}]},"item_11_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11391754","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_11_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"13450638","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_11_subject_20":{"attribute_name":"日本十進分類法","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"367","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"}]},"item_11_text_18":{"attribute_name":"形態","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"531602 bytes"}]},"item_11_text_47":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ・ローカル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"紀要論文"}]},"item_11_text_48":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ・NII","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]},"item_11_text_49":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ・DCMI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"text"}]},"item_11_text_50":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ・ローカル表示コード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"03"}]},"item_11_text_79":{"attribute_name":"所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"お茶の水女子大学大学院人間文化研究科博士後期過程１年"}]},"item_1623395637221":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"山本, 千晶","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"YAMAMOTO, Chiaki","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"71361","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-04-19"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"03_47-60.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"531.6 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"03_47-60.pdf","url":"https://teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp/record/37836/files/03_47-60.pdf"},"version_id":"062b2178-1b0b-4ca0-bbdb-f666fac65515"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"中絶","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"フェミニズム","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Casey判決","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"身体","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"責任","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「責任」をめぐるCasey判決とフェミニズム理論","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「責任」をめぐるCasey判決とフェミニズム理論","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"A Feminist Discourse and the Discussion of ‘Responsibility’in the Decision of Planned Parenthood v. Casey","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"11","owner":"1","path":["712"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2010-02-01"},"publish_date":"2010-02-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"37836","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「責任」をめぐるCasey判決とフェミニズム理論"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2022-12-12T05:43:40.286791+00:00"}