@article{oai:teapot.lib.ocha.ac.jp:00004277,
 author = {加藤, 知佳子 and 渡辺, さちや and 永田, 俊明 and 北村, 俊則 and KATO, Chikako and WATANABE, Sachiya and NAGATA, Toshiaki and KITAMURA, Toshinori},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {教育心理学研究},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {application/pdf, 学術雑誌論文, Agreement of diagnosis of psychiatric disorders by psychologists was examined in case vignette and inter-rater designs. In the case vignette design, the agreement of 3 graduate psychology students for the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC)A diagnosis was high for the most of the RDC diagnostic categories, except for Schizotypal Features. In the inter-rater design, disagreement was only observed among 2 out of 11 psychiatric in-patients. This suggested that an operationalized criteria could enable psychologists to establish diagnosis of psychiatric disorders reliably and therefore communicate and collaborate with psychiatric researchers.},
 pages = {413--417},
 title = {心理学専攻者による操作的診断基準の評定者間信頼度},
 volume = {38},
 year = {1990}
}