ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 紀要
  2. Journal of the Ochanomizu University English Society
  3. 10

Peer Feedback Comments and Revision Strategies of L2 Writers: Insights from the Analyses of Their Reflection Texts

http://hdl.handle.net/10083/0002000177
http://hdl.handle.net/10083/0002000177
3df747b9-78dc-48f0-9d61-ec7874f20022
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
No10_p5-22.pdf No10_p5-22.pdf (502 KB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2021-07-22
タイトル
タイトル Peer Feedback Comments and Revision Strategies of L2 Writers: Insights from the Analyses of Their Reflection Texts
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 peer review
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 L2 writing
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 feedback comments
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 AWE
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 revision strategies
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 畠山, 由香子

× 畠山, 由香子

ja 畠山, 由香子

en HATAKEYAMA, Yukako

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This paper aims to investigate what types of feedback comments pre-intermediate to intermediate learners of English in a women’s university in Japan generate in peer review. It also intends to clarify how the learners revise their essays. The participants consisted of two groups: One did peer review five times, and the other received automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback four times before one peer-review occasion. The participants’ reflection texts were used as data for analyses. The findings suggest that second language (L2) learners provide more critical feedback than compliments and more comments on global aspects of essays than local points in both groups. Time-series analyses and comparison with a control group that received AWE feedback showed that the number of peer-review opportunities contributed to increased critical comments and the comments on global points. It was also found that more specific and writer-friendly feedback comments consisting of two or three steps increased as the participants became more experienced in peer review. In both groups, the rate of the writers’ incorporation of critical comments into their revisions was found to be high, and they also used their own ideas and judgments to revise their drafts. Implications of the findings and limitations of this research are discussed.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : お茶の水女子大学英文学会 研究報告
en : Journal of the Ochanomizu University English Society

巻 10, p. 5-22, 発行日 2021-03
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
出版者
出版者 お茶の水女子大学英文学会
言語 ja
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-07-22 02:38:27.781827
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3