WEKO3
アイテム
Distinctive Management of Federal Funding for Biomedecal Research in the USA
http://hdl.handle.net/10083/1642
http://hdl.handle.net/10083/16424e6346c8-1702-422e-8837-a895646b92f0
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
研究技術計画13(1-2)_hakurakup.pdf (915.5 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-03-06 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Distinctive Management of Federal Funding for Biomedecal Research in the USA | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
HAKRAK, R.Bill
× HAKRAK, R.Bill |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Federal government's support in the USA for research and development in biomedicine is mainly managed by the NIH (National Institutes of Health). The NIH peer-review system by which the NIH funds all universities and non-profit organizations to support their biomedical research is described. The department (Division of Research Grants, DRG) that reviews the merit of proposed research is clearly separated from the various Institutes and Centers (ICs) that fund the research grants. The decision to support a research project is based both on the scientific merit and the priority of the IC funding mission. The review of the scientific merit is conducted by a panel of experts under the administration of a doctoral level scientist. The Program Directors who manage the grant portfolios in the ICs are also scientists with impressive publication records. The peer-review process is very efficient and handles about 30,000grants per year. The applicants receive the evaluation of their proposed research in written documents called the Summary Statements, which identify the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed research. Applicants have an opportunity to write in a protest letter called the Rebuttal letter if they feel the review was flawed. However, such complaints are rare and are usually resolved in a amicable fashion. Special emphasis is placed to encourage young scientists. In the NIH there are more meritorious applications reviewed than funded to support them. The number of applicants that can be funded is dependent upon the budget allocated by the USA congress. Finally, scientists who work in the universities and colleges have academic freedom to pursue research of their choice. | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
研究技術計画 巻 13, 号 1-2, p. 106-115, 発行日 1999-06-10 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09147020 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN1030142X | |||||
| 権利 | ||||||
| 権利情報 | 研究・技術計画学会 | |||||
| 権利 | ||||||
| 権利情報 | 本文データは学協会の許諾に基づきCiNiiから複製したものである | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 形態 | ||||||
| 値 | 915498 bytes | |||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 値 | publisher | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 400 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 研究・技術計画学会 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 学術雑誌論文 | |||||
| 資源タイプ・ローカル | ||||||
| 値 | 学術雑誌論文 | |||||
| 資源タイプ・NII | ||||||
| 値 | Journal Article | |||||
| 資源タイプ・DCMI | ||||||
| 値 | text | |||||
| 資源タイプ・ローカル表示コード | ||||||
| 値 | 01 | |||||
| 異版である | ||||||
| 関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
| 識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
| 関連識別子 | http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003775607/ | |||||
| 所属 | ||||||
| 値 | Associate Professor of Cell Biology at Ochanomizu University, Department of Biology, Ochanomizu University | |||||
